Landfill Leachate Treatment

Dynatec uses ultrafiltration, membrane bioreactors and reverse osmosis for landfill leachate applications.

warren county landfill

Various Treatment Requirements

The treatment requirements for leachate from landfills can vary, depending on the discharge requirements, and the contaminants present. Leachate from sanitary landfills is generally characterized by high TDS (dissolved solids), heavy metals, high BOD and/or COD (some very refractive), high ammonia, and color. Discharge options include discharge to a POTW or, where no access to sewer is available, discharge to ground or surface water. In the case of the latter, the treatment requirements are much greater than when discharge to a POTW is available.

In general, when discharging to a POTW, treatment requirements may include removal of heavy metals and ammonia. Further requirements may include removal of some BOD and also COD if maximum discharge limits are in place. Some discharge permits may also include color removal requirements, and occasionally, removal of some TDS, although these requirements are not typical.

In the case of ground or surface water discharge, removal of heavy metals, color, BOD/COD, ammonia and color, and also perhaps TDS will all be required.

Treatment Options

Dynatec can provide the MBR (membrane bioreactor) option, which is an aerated biological mixed liquor process operating at very high solids concentrations. Some of the advantages are:

  • Very long sludge age produces a well acclimated biomass, which because of the high concentration (typically 12,000 to 20,000 mg/l), provides very high rates of reaction.
  • Excellent nitrification and de-nitrification.
  • Smaller footprint then conventional aerated systems.
  • Very high quality effluent due to the use of membranes for final clarification.
  • Lower sludge production than conventional systems.

Typical results from an MBR operation at a sanitary landfill are as follows: 

Parameter BOD COD TSS Ammonia

Influent

35 1500 150 700
Effluent <5 1100 <5 6
% Removal >85 25 >96 >99

System Effluent

The effluent from this process is characterized by very low BOD , ammonia, and heavy metals, some remaining color, and high TDS. The system also produces bio-sludge, which depending on the requirements, can be dewatered for disposal, or disposed of as a liquid sludge.

Other Treatment Methods

An alternative method, which will generally apply for smaller flows, is to treat using reverse osmosis, which removes organic and inorganic contaminants, as well as color. Various configurations of this type of membrane are available, which can accommodate various levels of suspended solids. Where high solids (>500 mg/l) are present, consideration may be given to the use of tubular RO membranes. Where solids are at more moderate concentrations (50mg/l – 250 mg/l), a narrow channel configuration can be considered.

Parameter NH3 COD Cl F TDS Ba Fe Mg K Si Na
Raw Leachate 375 1400 1700 .75 5000 .33 15 200 250 25 1000
RO Permeate 30 60 40 ND 160 ND 0.04 1.5 19 0.9 48.5
% Removal 91.5 96 97 100 97 100 99.75 99 93 96 95

Effluent

The two effluent streams from a RO system are RO permeate, as noted above, and a concentrate (or reject) stream that represents between 10% and 30% of the feed flow. This can normally be re-injected into the landfill. One final treatment system configuration that is available, where very high levels of treatment are desired, is MBR followed by Reverse Osmosis. The MBR process provides the highest possible levels of organic removal, with essentially zero suspended solids in the effluent. This is the ideal feed system for Reverse Osmosis treatment. The RO permeate can then be used for other non-potable purposes, such as irrigation, truck washing or dust control.

Summary

  • Membrane treatment offers reliable and consistent treatment of landfill leachate.
  • Both in the US and abroad, membrane treatment is broadly applied, and is well proven.
  • Systems are highly cost effective, and require low levels of operator interface.
  • The best system configuration for each application should be individually evaluated.

 

Document downloads

Landfill Leachate - Morgantown.pdf
Landfill Leachate - Morgantown.pdf
pdf (860.53kb)
Landfill Leachate - PA.pdf
Landfill Leachate - PA.pdf
pdf (1,103.45kb)
Hazardous Waste landfill.pdf
Case Study of MBR and Metals Removal at Hazardous Waste Landfill
pdf (815.30kb)
Landfill Leachate Case History.pdf
Landfill Leachate Case History
pdf (657.26kb)
PCB Removal - Hazardous Landfill.pdf
PCB Removal - Hazardous Landfill.pdf
pdf (712.53kb)
Landfill Leachate - Lanchester.pdf
Landfill Leachate - Lanchester.pdf
pdf (1,085.75kb)
Containerized Membrane System.pdf
Containerized Membrane System.pdf
pdf (2,330.85kb)
Containerized MBR.pdf
Containerized MBR.pdf
pdf (1,074.58kb)
Landfill Leachate Treatment - NJ.pdf
Landfill Leachate Treatment - NJ.pdf
pdf (851.51kb)
Ultrafiltration.pdf
Ultrafiltration.pdf
pdf (646.14kb)
Reverse Osmosis.pdf
Reverse Osmosis.pdf
pdf (1,046.21kb)
Nanofiltration.pdf
Nanofiltration.pdf
pdf (1,141.88kb)
Tubular UF System Benefits.pdf
Tubular UF System Benefits.pdf
pdf (395.53kb)
Steel Tubing - Case History.pdf
Steel Tubing - Case History.pdf
pdf (1,023.43kb)
Membrane Separation vs. Chemical Treatment.pdf
Membrane Separation vs. Chemical Treatment.pdf
pdf (655.11kb)
Color Removal.pdf
Color Removal.pdf
pdf (1,068.00kb)
Membrane Technology for UV Transmittance Improvement.pdf
Membrane Technology for UV Transmittance Improvement.pdf
pdf (585.66kb)

Document downloads

Dynatec Capabilities.pdf
Dynatec Capabilities.pdf
pdf (1,424.49kb)